Serious Kat Gives Serious Answer

Well, first you must consider that my main breadwinning contract involves editing files that document the framework on which computers may remotely communicate with each other. In order to keep from going batshit insane and ending the contract early, I entertain myself by constantly refreshing several interesting websites a million times daily. Then you must also consider that my ability to carry two other clients, one of which is in Austin, Texas, solely depends on my ability to be accessible to them and their information set at any given time. As part of my workload, I maintain a website, which exists solely to give the organization an internet presence. Lastly, any extra-cirricular writing that I do is for such a narrow audience, consisting sometimes of just several members across the globe, that trying to raise capital to create even a regular newsletter wouldn’t be worth the trouble, let alone a valid publication.

So, if there were no internet, I wouldn’t be able to work. I’d have to resort to being a housewife.

Unfortunately, I tried that a couple years ago and I sucked at it. Without relying on a man for support and lacking any regular job skills that would make me an asset to a company, I’d have to go into business for myself and become a crack whore.

There’s really no middle ground here.

One Comment

  1. Anonymous says:

    I’m thinking about devising a plot to take down the internets. Not for world domination (although that will be a nice side benefit easily achieved now that I’ve cornered the market on fax machines) but just to see you make a run at your Plan B